Coronavirus (Covid-19): We're asking you please to only call 999 if it is an emergency and 101 if it is urgent. If you can, use our online services. If you’re looking for information about the government instruction to stay at home and how that may affect you, you'll find guidance on Gov.uk. We’ll be updating information on our services over the coming days, please check online for those updates.
From 1 May 2015, any new cases of police officer gross misconduct may result in hearings that can be attended by the public, including the media. The then Home Secretary, Theresa May, introduced the new regulations to help increase transparency within the police service.
Details of upcoming hearings will be published on this page. Hearings will be published with at least five days’ notice.
Any gross misconduct hearing is heard by a conduct panel. The panel is chaired by legally qualified person independent of the police service, accompanied by a senior police officer and an independent member who is unconnected to the police.
Members of the public can act as observers. Observers are not allowed to participate in proceedings, cannot comment on proceedings and have no involvement in the decision making process which remains with the conduct panel.
The result of the hearing will be published on this website for at least 28 days after the conclusion of the case.
Places are limited and will need to be booked in advance, at least 2 working days before the hearing, by emailing PSD@surrey.pnn.police.uk with the below details. To comply with the rules of attendance, observers are required to provide the following when booking:
Name Date of birth Address Contact telephone number
Please also note the following information about attending a hearing:
You must produce photographic ID and failure to do so will result in exclusion from the hearing
If you have not registered to attend in advance of the hearing, admittance will be declined
Travel and attendance is in your own time and at your own expense
Parking on police premises is not available
Refreshments are not provided and food and drink are not allowed in the hearing room
Anyone who is believed to present a security risk to the Force may not be allowed access to police premises and attendees could be searched if it’s felt necessary
Audio and video recording is not allowed unless expressly permitted by the hearing Chair
Any behaviour that does, or is likely to interfere with the proper conduct of proceedings may result in you being required to leave
At the discretion of the Chair, you may be required to leave part of the hearing, as rules governing the conduct of proceedings allow for all or part of the hearing NOT to be held in public
Those under the age of 16 cannot attend
Animals will not be permitted, with the exception of guide dogs/assistance dogs
Wherever possible venues will be selected to allow disabled access but this cannot be guaranteed
The Force reserves the right to decline attendance where numbers are restricted due to venue capacity. The Force may also offer places to members of the public who have not previously attended a hearing in favour of those who have already done so
Officers and staff of Surrey Police will only be permitted to attend on rest days or whilst off duty
If you have any queries that are not covered above please contact the Professional Standards Department by emailing PSD@surrey.pnn.police.uk or calling 01483 638451 during office hours.
Upcoming public police misconduct hearings
There are currently no upcoming hearings.
Outcomes of public hearings
Outcome of Misconduct Hearing (Police Officer)
On Wednesday 26 February 2020, a Misconduct Hearing was held in respect of Police Sergeant 40197 Adams. It was alleged that the officer had breached the Standards of Professional Behaviour in respect of Authority, Respect and Courtesy, Duties and Responsibilities and Conduct (Discreditable) in that he engaged in inappropriate workplace behaviour. The facts were accepted by the officer however it was not accepted that the circumstances of the matter amounted gross misconduct. The Panel determined that the breaches did amount to gross misconduct and the officer was dismissed without notice.